Polymarket Builders
Every app and bot that routes orders into Polymarket, ranked by the volume credited to it, with the traders, fill sizes and direction behind that volume.
Browse by category
Each builder is one kind of tool, and the choice between two terminals is a different question from the choice between two Telegram bots. Each page ranks its own kind.
- Trading Terminal115 ranked
- Telegram Bot11 ranked
- Copy Trading23 ranked
- Telegram Copy Bot8 ranked
- Analytics / Alerts39 ranked
- AI / Agents28 ranked
- Wallet / Exchange28 ranked
- Infrastructure12 ranked
Median fee traders paid per dollar routed, across the builders in each category with indexed execution data.
Compare all buildersOne table, one set of axes: volume, fees, fill size, traders per day.Builder write-ups
146 builders have a full page: what the tool is, how an order reaches the book, what it holds, what routing through it costs, and where it falls short. Figures inside the text are live, not frozen at publication.
How these numbers are measured
Attributed volume is Polymarket's own figure for a builder code: the notional credited when an order carries that code into the order book. It is the basis for rank and share.
The fee column is the rate a builder publishes for itself, and nothing here verifies it. An empty cell means the operator publishes nothing, which is not the same as charging nothing. Polymarket's own trading fee is set per market and is identical for every builder routing into that market, so it is not a point of difference between them.
The leaderboard refreshes through the day and every profile states the last complete day behind its figures. A builder with no indexed execution data yet shows a dash rather than a zero.
Builder activity is ecosystem context, not trading advice, and a large builder is not a recommendation. Cross-check a wallet or a market before acting on anything here.