Polymarket Telegram copy bots

8 ranked builders, $624.5M in attributed volume all time.

These bots combine the two patterns: a chat interface and an automatic mirror of another wallet. Fee structure matters more here than anywhere else in the catalogue, because copying multiplies the number of fills a strategy generates. A rate that looks small on one trade is the dominant cost once a bot has followed a wallet for a month.

Rank	Builder	Volume	7d Volume	Avg Fill	Traders per day
1	PO PolyCopReviewed	$359.9M	$3.2M	$21	327
2	PO PolygunReviewed	$117.6M	$476K	$21	149
3	WA WagerUpPilotReviewed	$107.3M	$47K	$151	6
4	PO PolyBotReviewed	$31M	$111K	$22	62
5	ON OnsightReviewed	$5.7M	$103	$31	1
6	PO PolyscoutReviewed	$1.1M	$0	—	0
7	PO PolyGold.TradeReviewed	$1.1M	$0	$20	0
8	PO PolyCopyBot	$817K	$0	—	0

How these numbers are measured

Attributed volume is Polymarket's own builder leaderboard: the notional credited to each builder code, all time and over the trailing seven complete days. The measured fee is trader-paid fees per dollar of V2-attributed on-chain volume, derived from Polynode's indexed OrderFilled events, which is what a trader actually paid rather than what a rate card says. The declared fee is whatever the builder publishes, and it sits on each builder's own profile next to the measured one.