Predicts.guruPredicts.guru
DO

Dock.Markets

Polymarket rank #523Trading TerminalData through 2026-09-14

Open Dock.Markets

Dock.Markets is a Polymarket trading terminal that lets traders route order flow under its own builder code. Attributed volume sits at $20 across its history, with no fills in the last week and no advertised fee schedule, so anyone considering it should treat it as unproven rather than avoid it outright.

Assessment written 2026-09-13. Every figure in it is live.

Volume, last 7 days
$0

No comparable prior period.

Traders per day
0

Mean distinct attributed traders per day over the last week.

Fills, last 7 days
0

No indexed execution data yet.

At a glance

Every figure a comparison needs, in one block.

Rank
#523By all-time attributed volume
Volume, all time
$20
Volume, last 7 days
$0
Fee as published
The builder's own stated rate
Average fill
Traders per day
0Mean over the last week
Wallets, last 30 days
0
Buy side
First fill
Fills, all time
0

Volume and rank come from Polymarket's builder leaderboard; fees, fills, and sides from indexed CLOB V2 activity through 2026-09-14.

Daily activity

Attributed volumeActive traders

What it is

Dock.Markets is a Polymarket trading terminal with a verified builder profile, meaning Polymarket confirms the order flow it attributes actually passes through its code. The operator publishes no fee schedule, so traders arrive with only the platform's own measurements to go on rather than a stated rate to check against.

By attributed volume it ranks #523 among builders, having routed $20 in total. The last complete week and the last thirty days both show $0 and $0 respectively, with 0 fills against 0 fills across its entire history and 0 wallets in the current cohort. Mean traders per day over the last week comes in at 0. That pattern reads as a tool that saw some early activity and then went quiet, not one carrying an active trading crowd.

How it works

A trader who routes flow through Dock.Markets does so under the operator's own builder code, the tag Polymarket attaches to every fill so the order can be traced back to the app that sent it. That is the same mechanism behind every number on this page: $20 attributed since the code went live, 0 fills logged in the most recent week, and 0 wallets counted in the current cohort. None of that activity is visible unless a trader actually executes through the builder's own flow, so the numbers reflect real orders rather than declared intent.

What isn't in the fact sheet is any statement from the operator about where a connected wallet's funds sit while an order is open, or what the app itself can and cannot touch. Polymarket's central limit order book still settles the trade once it is placed, but a trader deciding whether to route through Dock.Markets has to weigh that omission against the near absence of recent fills, since a quiet builder is harder to judge on execution quality than one processing flow every day.

What it does

  • Cost stays unstated

    The operator publishes no fee schedule, so a trader routing through Dock.Markets has to discover real cost by executing rather than checking a rate first.

  • Flow has gone quiet

    Attributed volume and fills over the last week and month both sit at nothing, meaning nobody sizing an order today trades alongside any active crowd.

  • Track record stays thin

    Lifetime attributed volume totals $20, a record small enough that execution quality and reliability under real size remain untested.

Who it is for

Traders testing new terminals
Someone curious about an unproven builder can try small size and watch the index update, since there is little established flow to unlearn.
Traders who want verified attribution
Anyone who wants Polymarket's own confirmation that routed volume is real, not just claimed, gets that from its verified profile status.
Early testers comfortable with uncertainty
With fills and cohort size at nothing recently, this suits someone willing to be an early tester rather than follow an established crowd.
Traders who verify cost first
Since no rate is published, this fits someone who checks the measured index before routing rather than trusting an advertised number that does not exist.

What it costs

Dock.Markets does not publish a fee schedule, which means the only way to know the real cost of routing through it is to place an order and watch what actually gets deducted. Predicts.guru measures trader-paid fees as a share of attributed volume on CLOB V2, but with 0 fills in the last week there isn't enough recent flow here to produce a usable number.

A trader sizing a position should treat the absence of a stated rate as something to confirm before committing meaningful size, not after. Watching $0 and 0 alongside whatever the index eventually measures is the only way to catch a cost surprise before it compounds across repeated trades.

Strengths

  • Its profile is verified on Polymarket, so the volume attributed to Dock.Markets is confirmed rather than a self-reported claim.
  • The entire track record, thin as it is, sits in the open and can be checked against Polymarket's own ledger rather than taken on trust.
  • Ranking #523 with only $20 in lifetime volume keeps the stakes small for an early tester, since there is little established flow to be misled by.
  • As a trading terminal rather than a passive tracker, it is built around placing and managing orders directly.

Limitations

  • It publishes no fee schedule, leaving cost entirely opaque until a trader executes and checks the index directly.
  • Attributed volume and fills have dropped to nothing over the last week and month, leaving no recent flow to judge execution against.
  • Its all-time record totals only $20, all of it from before the current dry spell.
  • A verified profile confirms Polymarket trusts the attribution, not that the tool safeguards funds or executes cleanly.
  • With 0 wallets in the current cohort, there is no active crowd whose behavior a newcomer could watch or copy.

Custody and transparency

A verified profile means Polymarket has confirmed that fills attributed to Dock.Markets' builder code are genuine, which limits one kind of risk: the volume and fill counts on this page aren't fabricated. It says nothing about how the app itself handles a connected wallet during a trade, and the operator offers no statement on that either.

With 0 fills in the last week and 0 wallets in the cohort, there is also no active user base whose experience a newcomer could lean on. Anyone routing flow through it right now would effectively be an early tester, with the operational risk that implies.

Verdict

Dock.Markets currently reads as a dormant listing more than an active venue: $20 in lifetime volume, nothing routed in the last week or month, and no fee schedule to compare against. Rank #523 is worth checking against the rest of the field before assuming much about current activity.

That makes it a reasonable curiosity for a trader who wants to test a new terminal with minimal size and no expectations, but a poor fit for anyone who needs proof of active execution, a stated cost, or a crowd of other traders to learn from before committing real size.

Score80% of the weighting has data
1.5out of 5
  • Traction35% weight

    attributed volume over the last seven complete days

  • Reach30% weight

    0 distinct traders per day

  • Transparency15% weight

    verified profile, no published fee, public site

Open Dock.Markets and see it yourself

dock.markets

Open Dock.Markets

Questions

  • Is Dock.Markets safe to use?

    Its profile is verified on Polymarket, so attributed volume is genuine rather than self-reported, but the operator states nothing about wallet handling during a trade, and recent activity sits at nothing to judge from.

  • What fees does Dock.Markets charge?

    The operator publishes no fee schedule, so there is no advertised rate to check. With no recent fills to measure, a trader currently has to execute first and find out what actually gets deducted.

  • How much volume has Dock.Markets processed?

    Lifetime attributed volume stands at $20, with nothing routed in the last complete week or the last thirty days, placing it at rank #523 among all builders Predicts.guru tracks.

  • Is Dock.Markets still active?

    Attributed volume and fills over the last week and month both come back at nothing, which reads as a builder that has gone quiet rather than one processing flow day to day.

  • What kind of traders use Dock.Markets?

    There is no way to tell right now. The current cohort holds 0 wallets and mean traders per day sits at 0, so there is no active crowd to describe.

  • Are there alternatives to Dock.Markets worth checking?

    Predicts.guru ranks every Polymarket builder by attributed volume, so a trader can compare Dock.Markets against other builders directly instead of relying on any single tool's own claims.

Most traded markets

Attributed volume over the last 30 days.

No recent market composition available.

Category mix

Where this builder's flow goes, last 30 days.

No recent market composition available.

Alternatives

The other Trading Terminal builders a trader would choose between, on the same measurements.

All 115 in this category
BuilderAll time
DODock.MarketsThis one
$20
$2.2B
$538.5M
$293.6M
$213M

Traders routing through this builder

Wallets that traded through this builder, ranked by realized P&L.

P&L is each wallet's global Polymarket result, not profit attributable to this builder. The builder only determines which wallets are listed.

No trader cohort data is available for this builder.

How these numbers are measured

Polymarket reports $20 of all-time volume for Dock.Markets, including attribution from before onchain V2. The indexed figure used for fees, fill sizes, and buy/sell split is $0, counted as outcome-share par notional on CLOB V2 only, so the two totals differ by design.

The written assessment on this page is editorial and is regenerated periodically; every figure inside it is resolved from the live data above at the moment the page renders.