Predicts.guruPredicts.guru
AG

aggr.bet

Polymarket rank #504Trading TerminalData through 2026-09-14

Open aggr.bet

aggr.bet is a Polymarket builder holding a verified profile, ranked #504 by attributed volume, though it shows $0 routed in the last seven days and $0 over the last thirty. Its own website currently returns a not-found error. It suits nobody needing a working front end right now; confirm it is live again before routing money through it.

Assessment written 2026-09-13. Every figure in it is live.

Volume, last 7 days
$0

No comparable prior period.

Traders per day
0

Mean distinct attributed traders per day over the last week.

Fills, last 7 days
0

No indexed execution data yet.

At a glance

Every figure a comparison needs, in one block.

Rank
#504By all-time attributed volume
Volume, all time
$89
Volume, last 7 days
$0
Fee as published
The builder's own stated rate
Average fill
Traders per day
0Mean over the last week
Wallets, last 30 days
0
Buy side
First fill
Fills, all time
0

Volume and rank come from Polymarket's builder leaderboard; fees, fills, and sides from indexed CLOB V2 activity through 2026-09-14.

Daily activity

Attributed volumeActive traders

What it is

aggr.bet is a Polymarket builder, third-party software that routes order flow into Polymarket's markets under its own builder code so fills get credited to it rather than to a generic address. Predicts.guru catalogs it under trading terminals, and its Polymarket profile carries a verified badge, but the volume behind that badge is thin: $89 attributed across its entire history, good for a rank of #504 among the builders this index tracks.

What a trader actually finds once they follow the link is another matter. The address on file, aggr.bet, currently returns a Railway not-found page rather than any description of screens, order types, or account setup, so the operator's own account of the product is not something this page can draw on. Anyone who bookmarked it earlier should treat that broken page as current information, not a glitch to click past.

How it works

Reaching aggr.bet starts at the website Predicts.guru has on file for it, and right now that address resolves to a Railway not-found screen instead of a login or connect-wallet flow. That means the ordinary path, open the site, connect a wallet, place an order, is not verifiable today; whatever front end the builder once ran isn't answering at that address.

When a fill does route through aggr.bet's builder code, it settles the same way any Polymarket order does: on Polymarket's own central limit order book on Polygon, with the trade credited to aggr.bet rather than sitting in some separate venue the builder controls. That routing model is why attributed volume can be measured at all, and it holds regardless of whether the builder's own front end is currently reachable.

Custody is the open question. Because the operator's page does not currently describe how funds move before they hit Polymarket, whether aggr.bet ever holds a balance, requires a deposit, or simply signs transactions from a connected wallet is something only the operator can answer, and it has not published anything to answer it with right now.

What it does

  • No fee schedule

    aggr.bet publishes no rate card, so a trader has to rely on Polymarket's own trading fee alone rather than any markup the builder states up front.

  • Website currently down

    The address on file for aggr.bet returns a Railway not-found page, so there is no dashboard, wallet-connect screen, or order form to test before deciding to route anything through it.

  • Dormant fill history

    Fills have stopped for a long stretch, with 0 in the last week and $0 routed over the last thirty days, leaving no recent activity to size execution against.

Who it is for

Traders checking a bookmarked builder
Someone who used aggr.bet earlier can use its listing here to see the account has gone quiet, with $0 routed in the last seven days, before sending it anything new.
Researchers tracking builder activity
Analysts comparing builder codes get a data point on a mostly inactive one, useful for spotting which tools have effectively stopped attracting order flow.
New traders picking a first terminal
Anyone choosing where to route their first order should look elsewhere until aggr.bet's own website resolves again and states how it actually works.
Traders sizing counterparty risk
Because attributed volume sits at only $89 across its whole history, exposure to this specific builder's flow has stayed small enough to matter little to the wider market.

What it costs

aggr.bet does not publish a fee schedule, so nothing here states a percentage or a flat rate a trader can plan around before placing an order. Whatever it charges beyond Polymarket's own trading fee is not written down anywhere the operator controls, including the page that currently returns a not-found error instead of pricing terms.

Fill activity has also gone quiet, with 0 logged in the last seven days and 0 across its entire history, which leaves too thin a record to size what a markup would even look like in practice. A trader who wants pricing certainty should ask before routing size through it, not assume Polymarket's base fee is the whole story.

Strengths

  • Its profile on Polymarket carries a verified badge, so the attribution behind its numbers is not spoofed.
  • Every order that does route through it settles on Polymarket's own order book, so execution follows the same rules as trading directly.
  • The all-time volume behind it is tiny, so a trader's exposure to this one builder's reliability stays small by default.
  • Its listing is public and ranked at #504, keeping a paper trail even while the builder itself goes quiet.

Limitations

  • Its own website currently returns a not-found error, so there is no working front end to open, connect a wallet to, or place an order from right now.
  • It publishes no fee schedule, leaving the actual cost of using it undefined until the operator states one.
  • Routed volume has stopped: $0 in the last seven days and $0 over the last thirty, with no fills in that window either.
  • There is no cohort of active traders behind it currently, so there's no crowd of recent users to gauge how it performs under real order flow.

Custody and transparency

Custody isn't addressed anywhere this page can check: the operator's own site returns a not-found error instead of describing whether funds pass straight through to Polymarket or sit with the builder first. Transparency is limited to what Polymarket's own attribution records show, since aggr.bet has not published fee terms or a working product description of its own.

Operational exposure is low right now simply because so little activity exists: $0 routed in the last seven days and 0 wallets in the current trader cohort, meaning almost nobody is currently trusting it with live orders.

Verdict

aggr.bet is a Polymarket builder in name and in its verified profile, but not in current practice. Its own website returns a not-found error, its attributed volume has flatlined at $0 for the week and $0 for the month, and its all-time total sits at a modest $89. None of that rules out a relaunch, but none of it supports routing money through it today either.

A trader who already has a position tied to it should watch for the site coming back online before adding to it. Anyone starting fresh should pick a builder with a working front end and a recent fill history instead.

Score80% of the weighting has data
1.5out of 5
  • Traction35% weight

    attributed volume over the last seven complete days

  • Reach30% weight

    0 distinct traders per day

  • Transparency15% weight

    verified profile, no published fee, public site

Open aggr.bet and see it yourself

aggr.bet

Open aggr.bet

Questions

  • Is aggr.bet safe to use?

    Its Polymarket profile is verified, but its own website currently returns a not-found error and it publishes no fee schedule, so there is nothing beyond Polymarket's attribution records to judge custody or transparency against right now.

  • What is aggr.bet?

    aggr.bet is a Polymarket builder, third-party software that routes trades into Polymarket's markets under its own code, ranked #504 by attributed volume with $89 routed across its entire history to date.

  • What fees does aggr.bet charge?

    The operator publishes no fee schedule, and fills have gone quiet enough, 0 in the last seven days, that there isn't a recent record to size any markup on top of Polymarket's own trading fee.

  • Does aggr.bet still work?

    Its listed website currently returns a Railway not-found page rather than a working product, and attributed volume shows $0 for the last seven days and $0 for the last thirty, both signs it has gone quiet.

  • What are the alternatives to aggr.bet?

    Predicts.guru ranks builders by attributed volume, so a trader can compare aggr.bet's rank of #504 against builders showing recent fills and a published fee schedule before choosing where to route orders.

  • How does aggr.bet route orders?

    Any fill credited to its builder code settles on Polymarket's own central limit order book on Polygon, the same venue every other builder and direct Polymarket trader shares, just tagged to a different code.

Most traded markets

Attributed volume over the last 30 days.

No recent market composition available.

Category mix

Where this builder's flow goes, last 30 days.

No recent market composition available.

Alternatives

The other Trading Terminal builders a trader would choose between, on the same measurements.

All 115 in this category
BuilderAll time
AGaggr.betThis one
$89
$2.2B
$538.5M
$293.6M
$213M

Traders routing through this builder

Wallets that traded through this builder, ranked by realized P&L.

P&L is each wallet's global Polymarket result, not profit attributable to this builder. The builder only determines which wallets are listed.

No trader cohort data is available for this builder.

How these numbers are measured

Polymarket reports $89 of all-time volume for aggr.bet, including attribution from before onchain V2. The indexed figure used for fees, fill sizes, and buy/sell split is $0, counted as outcome-share par notional on CLOB V2 only, so the two totals differ by design.

The written assessment on this page is editorial and is regenerated periodically; every figure inside it is resolved from the live data above at the moment the page renders.