Loading wallet statistics...
Trader Overview
macbook2012 (0xc34faf3d897b9ef58468d707c960226f1e29cb9e) Polymarket trader just proved that 99% win rate can still destroy your account — $587 profit on $15,212 deposited is the most brutal efficiency disaster on the leaderboard.
Call this the anti-whale profile. Ranked #72,941 despite 1,594 total trades and a frankly inhuman 99.24% win rate on Polymarket, macbook2012 is a noise farmer caught in the worst trap prediction markets set: being right constantly but broke anyway. The strategy is pure volume arbitrage — 29 trades per day across 1,593 different markets, betting micro-positions ($390 average) at 0.998 entry price. Essentially scalping pennies on obviously mispriced binary outcomes, the kind of edge that works until it doesn't.
The data splits personality. Best trade pulled $127 on Highest temperature in Buenos Aires on February 9?. Worst trade? Down $2,070 on Monad public sale total commitments above _ ?. That gap tells the whole story — one tail risk position ate a year of scalp gains. This Polymarket whale has 1,588 closed positions and only 6 still breathing, meaning discipline exists, but position sizing doesn't scale with conviction. The 99.81% negative ROI on deposits screams it: deposited $15,212, withdrawn exactly zero, sits on $29 in portfolio value. Not even a rescue bounce.
Real edge here is boring infrastructure and patience for markets nobody else reads. Temperature in Buenos Aires? Monad commitments? These aren't sexy. Nobody's doing deep research. A bot running lines against public data, a script that catches the obvious misprices before they're obvious — that's the play. High-frequency prediction market arbitrage works until liquidity vanishes or one correlated event breaks your assumption.
The contrarian read: macbook2012 isn't a failure, he's a warning. This is what 99% win rate looks like when you're not measuring profitability per unit risk. Currently holding 6 open positions with near-zero portfolio value. The Polymarket leaderboard ranks him nowhere because fees, slippage, and catastrophic tail risk converted genius into a $587 monument to why whales that scale horizontally instead of vertically get liquidated sideways.
whaleRisk: low