Predicts.guruPredicts.guru
PO

polymatics

Polymarket 排名第 172Analytics / Alerts首笔成交 2026-04-28数据截至 2026-09-14@polymatics_algo

打开 polymatics

Polymatics is an institutional-grade execution and risk-management platform built for Polymarket and Kalshi, combining TWAP, VWAP, ICEBERG and GRID order algorithms with a portfolio risk dashboard and AI-driven analytics. It suits desks that want algorithmic order slicing over manual clicking, though access currently requires a private-beta request rather than an open signup.

评述写于 2026-09-13。其中每个数字都是实时的。

近 7 天交易量
$7K

较前 7 天-39.7%。

日均交易者
0

近一周每天归因到的独立交易者平均数。

近 7 天成交笔数
56

全部时间平均成交额 $110。

关键数据

一处看全比较所需的每个数字。

排名
#172按全部时间归因交易量
全部时间交易量
$513K
近 7 天交易量
$7K较前一周-39.7%
公布费率
该生态工具自己声明的费率
平均成交额
$110
日均交易者
1近一周的平均值
近 30 天钱包数
1
买入占比
63%
首笔成交
2026-04-28有活动的天数 140 天
全部时间成交笔数
2.6K

交易量与排名来自 Polymarket 的生态工具排行榜;手续费、成交与买卖方向来自截至 2026-09-14 的已索引 CLOB V2 活动。

每日活动

归因交易量活跃交易者

What it is

Polymatics is a trading infrastructure platform for prediction markets, built around algorithmic execution rather than a simple order form. Its stated toolkit includes TWAP, VWAP, ICEBERG and GRID execution strategies, smart order routing between Polymarket and Kalshi, a portfolio risk dashboard tracking value at risk, concentration and correlation, and an AI layer for opportunity detection, execution optimization, predictive analytics, audit logs, regulatory reporting and performance attribution.

Access sits behind a private beta that a trader has to request rather than simply opening. On Polymarket its builder code has attracted $513K in attributed volume across 2.6K fills since 2026-04-28, with an average fill of $110 and 1 distinct wallets trading a day in the most recent stretch, numbers that describe a young, lightly used route into the order book rather than a venue tested across a full market cycle.

How it works

A trader requests access to the private beta before doing anything else; polymatics does not publish a public signup or self-serve onboarding flow, so getting in is a gate the operator controls, not a form a visitor fills out and starts trading from immediately.

Once inside, orders route through the platform's execution algorithms toward Polymarket's order book, with smart order routing also reaching Kalshi, so a single instruction can work across both venues instead of being placed manually on each. TWAP and VWAP algorithms spread an order over time, ICEBERG hides size, and GRID runs a rules-based strategy, all aimed at cutting the market impact a large order would otherwise cause.

Polymatics does not state whether it takes custody of trader funds or simply forwards instructions to Polymarket's own contracts; the product page describes portfolio risk analysis, audit logs and regulatory reporting as record-keeping features, but says nothing about where funds sit between an order being placed and a fill landing.

What it does

  • Algorithmic execution suite

    TWAP, VWAP, ICEBERG and GRID strategies slice large orders over time or hide their size, aimed at reducing the market impact a single big order would cause.

  • Cross-venue order routing

    Smart order routing works an instruction across Polymarket and Kalshi rather than requiring a trader to split and place it manually on each venue.

  • Portfolio risk dashboard

    Tracks value at risk, concentration and correlation at the position level, flagging exposure a trader watching price alone would miss.

  • Audit logs and reporting

    Keeps a record of execution and performance attribution, useful for a desk that has to document trades for compliance rather than just its own memory.

  • AI opportunity detection

    Machine-learning scans flag potential setups and execution tweaks, though the trader still decides whether to act on what it surfaces.

Who it is for

Desks running large orders
Algorithmic slicing across TWAP, VWAP and ICEBERG matters most when an order is big enough to move the market on its own.
Traders working Polymarket and Kalshi
Smart order routing lets one instruction reach both venues instead of managing two separate tickets by hand.
Risk-conscious portfolio managers
The VaR and concentration dashboard surfaces exposure across positions that a single market's order book never shows.
Compliance-minded funds
Audit logs and regulatory reporting give a paper trail that a casual trading app does not generate.
Casual one-off bettors
A private-beta request and institutional tooling built for slicing large orders is more machinery than a single small wager needs.

What it costs

Polymatics does not publish a fee schedule; the product page markets execution quality and risk tooling rather than a price list, so there is no advertised rate to quote here. Polymarket's own trading fee is set per market and applies the same way regardless of which builder routes the order, so it isn't something that separates polymatics from any other tool. Before routing size through it, a trader should ask the operator directly what the platform itself charges for access or execution, since the private-beta gate suggests pricing may be negotiated rather than posted, and nothing in the public material says otherwise.

Strengths

  • Offers algorithmic order types, TWAP, VWAP, ICEBERG and GRID, that a plain limit order screen cannot replicate.
  • Routes a single instruction across both Polymarket and Kalshi rather than forcing manual execution on each venue.
  • Includes a portfolio risk dashboard that tracks value at risk and concentration rather than leaving a trader to track exposure by hand.
  • Produces audit logs and performance attribution that a compliance-minded desk can hand to a reviewer.
  • Aims at the space between a plain market order and the execution tooling that larger accounts require.

Limitations

  • Access is gated behind a private beta and a request form, not something a trader can start using today.
  • Its own advertised fee is unpublished, leaving cost to a private conversation with the operator rather than a public rate card.
  • Attributed volume on Polymarket sits at $513K with 1 distinct wallets trading a day recently, a footprint that has not yet been tested at scale or across a market cycle.
  • Says nothing about whether it takes custody of trader funds between an order and a fill.
  • Built around institutional features like value-at-risk and regulatory reporting that add complexity a smaller trader may not need.

Custody and transparency

Polymatics does not state whether it holds trader funds or purely routes instructions to Polymarket's and Kalshi's own systems, and the product page is silent on custody arrangements entirely. Access is controlled through a private-beta request rather than an open signup, so the operator vets who gets in before a trader can commit anything. The audit logs and regulatory reporting the platform advertises are record-keeping features, not a substitute for knowing where funds sit while an order is open; a trader should confirm custody and settlement directly with the operator before routing size through an unpublished-fee, invite-only system.

Verdict

Polymatics reads as an attempt to bring desk-grade execution tooling, algorithmic order types, cross-venue routing and risk analytics, to a market that has mostly offered manual clicking. That ambition is real on the product page, but the private-beta gate, unpublished fee and #172 on the attributed-volume leaderboard mean the tool has not yet built a public track record on Polymarket itself. A trader who already manages size across Polymarket and Kalshi and wants algorithmic slicing has a reason to request access. A smaller trader placing occasional bets on single markets gains little from a risk dashboard built for larger books and should stick to simpler tools.

评分权重中有 100% 有数据
2.2满分 5 分
  • 热度权重 35%

    attributed volume over the last seven complete days

  • 覆盖权重 30%

    1 distinct traders per day

  • 运营记录权重 20%

    routing since 2026-04-28

  • 透明度权重 15%

    verified profile, no published fee, public site

打开 polymatics,亲自体验

polymatics.info

打开 polymatics

Questions

  • What is polymatics?

    Polymatics is an institutional-grade execution and risk platform for Polymarket and Kalshi, offering algorithmic order types and portfolio risk analytics, currently open only through a private-beta access request.

  • Is polymatics safe to use?

    Polymatics does not state whether it custodies trader funds, and access is gated behind a private beta, so a trader should confirm custody and settlement directly with the operator before routing money through it.

  • What fees does polymatics charge?

    Polymatics publishes no fee schedule; a trader has to ask the operator directly what access or execution costs, since Polymarket's own per-market trading fee is separate and identical across every builder.

  • How does polymatics work?

    A trader requests access to the private beta, then places orders that route through algorithmic strategies like TWAP, VWAP, ICEBERG and GRID toward Polymarket's order book, with smart routing also reaching Kalshi.

  • What order types does polymatics support?

    The platform lists TWAP, VWAP, ICEBERG and GRID execution algorithms alongside custom strategies, built to spread or hide large orders rather than fill them in one clip.

  • What are alternatives to polymatics?

    Predicts.guru tracks many builders that route flow into Polymarket; comparing #172 and attributed volume against other tools on the leaderboard shows how much flow each carries.

  • Is polymatics live on Polymarket now?

    Yes, it has routed volume since 2026-04-28 and data through 2026-09-14 shows continued activity, though the operator still describes the wider product as a private beta.

交易最多的市场

近 30 天的归因交易量。

  • 1Counter-Strike: CYBERSHOKE Prospects vs ex-Zero Tenacity (BO3) - NODWIN Clutch Series Group Stage$4K
  • 2Counter-Strike: Lavked vs Vexar (BO3) - Exort Fiesta Group Stage$3K
  • 3Counter-Strike: Lavked vs Vexar - Map 2 Winner$2K
  • 4Counter-Strike: Team Nemesis vs Sinners (BO3) - 1win Private Club #1: Closed Qualifier Playoffs$2K
  • 5Counter-Strike: paiN Academy vs Peladona - Map 2 Winner$2K
  • 6Counter-Strike: Butterfly vs Black Phoenix (BO3) - NODWIN Clutch Series Group Stage$2K
  • 7Counter-Strike: ex-RUBY vs Black Phoenix (BO3) - NODWIN Clutch Series Group Stage$2K
  • 8Counter-Strike: Lavked vs Vexar - Map 1 Winner$2K
  • 9Counter-Strike: Bushido Wildcats vs Honvéd - Map 2 Winner$1K
  • 10Counter-Strike: 1WIN vs INOX Division (BO3) - NODWIN Clutch Series Playoffs$1K

分类构成

近 30 天该生态工具的流量去向。

  • esports$54K

替代选择

交易者会在同样的指标下,于这些其他 Analytics / Alerts 类生态工具之间做选择。

该分类全部 39 个
生态工具全部时间
POpolymatics当前
$513K
$272.1M
$79.1M
$44.1M
$14.6M

通过该生态工具交易的交易者

近 30 天有 1 个钱包通过该生态工具交易,按已实现盈亏排名。

盈亏是各钱包在 Polymarket 的全局结果,并非该生态工具带来的利润。生态工具只决定哪些钱包会出现在此列表中。

#钱包30 天已实现盈亏路由交易量
10x757c…faad$538$54K

这些数字如何计算

Polymarket 公布 polymatics 的全部时间交易量为 $513K,其中包含链上 V2 之前的归因。用于计算手续费、成交额和买卖占比的已索引口径为 $287K,仅按 CLOB V2 上的结果份额面值统计,因此两个总量本就不同。

归因交易量中有 63% 为买入,可据此判断该平台主要被用于开仓还是平仓。

本页的文字评述属于编辑内容,会定期重新生成;其中的每个数字都在页面渲染时从上方的实时数据中取值。