Predicts.guruPredicts.guru
LI

Liquid

Polymarket 排名第 510Trading Terminal数据截至 2026-09-14@getliquidapp

Liquid is a Polymarket trading terminal that currently shows almost no attributed order flow, sitting at rank #510 on the all-time volume leaderboard with total routed volume of $55. It suits traders scouting new terminals rather than anyone routing size today, since recent activity and cohort figures read as empty for the last complete week.

评述写于 2026-09-13。其中每个数字都是实时的。

近 7 天交易量
$0

无可比的上一周期。

日均交易者
0

近一周每天归因到的独立交易者平均数。

近 7 天成交笔数
0

暂无已索引的成交数据。

关键数据

一处看全比较所需的每个数字。

排名
#510按全部时间归因交易量
全部时间交易量
$55
近 7 天交易量
$0
公布费率
该生态工具自己声明的费率
平均成交额
日均交易者
0近一周的平均值
近 30 天钱包数
0
买入占比
首笔成交
全部时间成交笔数
0

交易量与排名来自 Polymarket 的生态工具排行榜;手续费、成交与买卖方向来自截至 2026-09-14 的已索引 CLOB V2 活动。

每日活动

归因交易量活跃交易者

What it is

Liquid is a Polymarket trading terminal listed with a verified profile, placed at rank #510 among builders ranked by all-time attributed volume. Polymarket's central limit order book routes trades from every terminal, wallet and bot that carries a builder code, and Liquid is one of the smaller entries in that list, with total attributed volume of $55 recorded since tracking began.

The operator publishes no fee schedule for Liquid, so traders arrive without a stated rate to weigh against the cost of trading there. The trader cohort behind that volume numbers 0 wallets in the last thirty days, and the terminal has logged 0 fills in total, figures that describe a tool with a thin, largely dormant track record rather than an active venue.

How it works

A trader who routes flow through Liquid connects a Polymarket-compatible wallet and places orders that Polymarket's central limit order book matches against the rest of the market, the same book every other builder shares. Liquid's builder code tags the resulting fills so Polymarket's own accounting credits the volume to this profile rather than to Polymarket's default interface, which is how the $55 in lifetime attributed volume and the 0 fills get counted at all.

Settlement happens on Polygon through Polymarket's own smart contracts, and a builder code does not give the terminal custody of trader funds; the wallet that signs an order keeps the assets before and after the trade. What Liquid does not disclose is a fee schedule, so a trader cannot check the terminal's own math against what Polymarket settles. With 0 distinct traders routing through it on an average day over the last week, the cohort using it right now is worth checking before assuming it is actively maintained.

What it does

  • No custody of trader funds

    Assets stay in the trader's own wallet at every step, so Liquid is never in a position to freeze or move a balance.

  • On-chain settlement trail

    Every fill settles through Polymarket's contracts on Polygon, letting a trader verify a trade independently of anything Liquid reports.

  • No deposit step required

    A trader signs orders from their existing wallet rather than funding a separate balance inside Liquid before trading.

Who it is for

Terminal comparison shoppers
Useful for a trader building a shortlist of Polymarket builders to test, since it carries a verified profile and a small amount of recorded volume.
Traders chasing active liquidity
Not a fit right now: attributed volume over the last seven and thirty days reads as $0 and $0, with no distinct traders recorded per day.
Traders needing deep liquidity
Skip it for size: 0 fills over the last week and 0 traders per day give no sign of desk-level liquidity.
Risk-averse first-time builder users
A thin caution: with no stated fee schedule and no recent fills, there's little history to judge before routing size through Liquid.
Traders tracking builder momentum
Best approached with the #510 figure and $0 volume pulled up live, since the picture here can shift quickly from where it stands today.

What it costs

Liquid publishes no fee schedule, so a trader has no stated rate from the operator to weigh against Polymarket's own execution costs before routing an order. That gap matters more as size grows, since a desk moving real volume usually wants a number to model against before committing flow.

Attributed volume sits at $55 with no fills recorded in the last seven days, so there is too little recent activity to form a picture of what trading here currently costs. Anyone comparing Liquid against a builder with a published rate should treat the fee question as unresolved rather than favorable or unfavorable.

Strengths

  • Liquid holds a verified profile on Polymarket, which confirms its builder code is registered rather than spoofed.
  • Trades settle non-custodially through Polymarket's own contracts, so the terminal never holds trader funds between orders.
  • The lifetime attributed volume of $55 confirms the builder code has carried genuine, on-chain trade flow at some point rather than sitting entirely unused.
  • A trader can check the leaderboard rank of #510 directly rather than relying on marketing language to judge where Liquid stands.
  • No deposit step is required before trading, since orders route straight from the trader's own connected wallet.

Limitations

  • The operator publishes no fee schedule, leaving a trader to trade without a stated cost to plan around.
  • No fills and no attributed volume appear in the last seven or thirty days, so recent activity reads as inactive.
  • The thirty-day trader cohort is empty, meaning no fresh wallets have routed through Liquid lately.
  • The rank of #510 and lifetime volume of $55 reflect a limited track record, too thin to judge execution quality with confidence.

Custody and transparency

Trading through Liquid does not require depositing funds into the terminal itself; settlement runs through Polymarket's own contracts, so custody risk sits with the trader's wallet rather than with Liquid's infrastructure. The operator discloses no fee schedule, which is a transparency gap a trader should weigh before connecting a wallet, since there is no published number to hold the terminal accountable to. With no fills in the last seven days and an empty thirty-day trader cohort, operational risk leans toward the terminal being unmaintained rather than actively monitored, which matters if something goes wrong mid-session.

Verdict

Liquid reads as a builder that registered on Polymarket and processed a small amount of flow at some point, then went quiet. Lifetime volume of $55 and a rank of #510 confirm it exists and has moved real trades, but no fills in the last seven days and an empty thirty-day cohort mean there is no current activity to evaluate. Pair that with an unpublished fee schedule and the case for routing money through it today is weak. A trader doing due diligence on the full list of Polymarket builders can note it and move on; anyone looking for an active terminal with a stated cost should look elsewhere until fresh volume shows up.

评分权重中有 80% 有数据
1.3满分 5 分
  • 热度权重 35%

    attributed volume over the last seven complete days

  • 覆盖权重 30%

    0 distinct traders per day

  • 透明度权重 15%

    verified profile, no published fee, no public site

Questions

  • Is Liquid safe to use for trading on Polymarket?

    Liquid does not custody trader funds since settlement runs through Polymarket's own contracts, but it discloses no fee schedule and shows no recent fills, so treat it as unverified by current activity rather than proven safe or risky.

  • What is Liquid on Polymarket?

    Liquid is a Polymarket trading terminal with a verified profile and its own builder code, ranked #510 by all-time attributed volume of $55 on Polymarket's order book.

  • How much does Liquid charge in fees?

    The operator does not publish a fee schedule for Liquid, so there is no stated rate to quote; a trader has to weigh unknown cost against the terminal's thin, largely inactive recent history before routing an order.

  • Does Liquid hold custody of trader funds?

    No. Orders settle through Polymarket's own smart contracts on Polygon, and a builder code does not grant Liquid access to a trader's wallet or balance at any point in the process.

  • Is Liquid still active on Polymarket?

    Recent figures read as quiet: no fills or attributed volume appear in the last seven or thirty days, and the trader cohort for that window is empty, though lifetime volume of $55 shows it has traded before.

  • What are alternatives to Liquid for trading Polymarket markets?

    A trader comparing builders should check each one's leaderboard rank, recent attributed volume and whether it publishes a fee schedule, since those three factors separate an active, transparent terminal from one with a thin or stale track record.

交易最多的市场

近 30 天的归因交易量。

暂无近期市场构成数据。

分类构成

近 30 天该生态工具的流量去向。

暂无近期市场构成数据。

替代选择

交易者会在同样的指标下,于这些其他 Trading Terminal 类生态工具之间做选择。

该分类全部 115 个
生态工具全部时间
LILiquid当前
$55
$2.2B
$538.7M
$293.7M
$213M

通过该生态工具交易的交易者

通过该生态工具交易的钱包,按已实现盈亏排名。

盈亏是各钱包在 Polymarket 的全局结果,并非该生态工具带来的利润。生态工具只决定哪些钱包会出现在此列表中。

暂无该生态工具的交易者群体数据。

这些数字如何计算

Polymarket 公布 Liquid 的全部时间交易量为 $55,其中包含链上 V2 之前的归因。用于计算手续费、成交额和买卖占比的已索引口径为 $0,仅按 CLOB V2 上的结果份额面值统计,因此两个总量本就不同。

本页的文字评述属于编辑内容,会定期重新生成;其中的每个数字都在页面渲染时从上方的实时数据中取值。