Predicts.guruPredicts.guru
PO

Polyzard

Polymarket 排名第 42Trading Terminal首筆成交 2026-04-30數據截至 2026-09-14@PolyzardApp

開啟 Polyzard

Polyzard is a Polymarket trading terminal that routes order flow into the market under its own builder code, sitting at rank #42 by all-time attributed volume. Average fill size points to accounts sizing serious tickets rather than casual bets, but recent volume has dried up, so check whether it's still active before routing money through it.

評述撰寫於 2026-09-13。其中每項數字皆為即時數據。

近 7 天交易量
$0

無可比較的前期數據。

每日交易者
0

近一週每日平均歸因獨立交易者數。

近 7 天成交筆數
0

全部時間平均成交 $5K。

一覽

比較所需的每項數字,集中於一處。

排名
#42依全部時間歸因交易量
交易量(全部時間)
$13.8M
交易量(近 7 天)
$0
宣告費率
生態工具自行公布的費率
平均成交
$5K
每日交易者
0近一週平均
錢包數(近 30 天)
0
買方占比
52.5%
首筆成交
2026-04-30138 天有活動
成交筆數(全部時間)
172

交易量與排名來自 Polymarket 的生態工具排行榜;手續費、成交與買賣方來自已索引的 CLOB V2 活動,截至 2026-09-14。

每日活動

歸因交易量活躍交易者

What it is

Polyzard is a trading terminal built to route order flow into Polymarket under its own builder code, listed in the trading terminal category and carrying a verified profile on the exchange. Polymarket's own accounting places it at rank #42 by all-time attributed volume, with $13.8M routed through its code since the terminal's first recorded fill on 2026-04-30.

That history amounts to 172 fills over 138, averaging $5K per ticket, a size that reads as a desk or a well-funded account rather than a small retail wallet. Buy share sits at 52.5% of routed volume, so the flow has carried both entries and exits rather than skewing hard toward one side. The last seven and thirty days show $0 and $0 respectively, with 0 fills and 0 traders a day in that recent window, a level of quiet worth noting before you rely on it for a live order.

How it works

A trader who routes an order through Polyzard has it tagged with the terminal's own builder code before it reaches Polymarket's central limit order book, which is what lets Polymarket's own accounting credit the fill back to Polyzard rather than to the trader's wallet directly or another route. That tagging is the entire mechanism: execution and settlement still happen on Polymarket's own contracts, so the terminal is a routing layer rather than a separate market.

Nothing in what Polyzard publishes indicates it takes custody of trader funds; positions and balances stay where Polymarket itself holds them, on-chain and under the trader's own wallet. What the terminal actually adds on top of that plain routing, in terms of screens or order types, is not something it states, so a trader evaluating it is really evaluating the flow it has already carried rather than a feature list.

That flow has gone quiet. 0 fills and $0 in the last week, against 172 fills and $13.8M since 2026-04-30, means the pipe that would carry a new order today hasn't carried one in some time, which is itself something to weigh before routing size through it.

What it does

  • Two-sided order flow

    Routed volume splits close to evenly between opening and closing trades at 52.5% buy share, so it isn't a venue where traders only enter and never route an exit.

  • Large average ticket size

    Average fill size runs to $5K, a scale that fits a funded account sizing into a position rather than someone testing the terminal with a few dollars.

  • Multi-month trading history

    Its attributed fills stretch back to 2026-04-30, giving it 138 on record, long enough to have traded through more than one short-term swing in the market.

Who it is for

Traders sizing large positions
If you're moving size, the average fill here, $5K, matches accounts placing serious tickets rather than a few dollars at a time.
Traders who enter and exit
Buy share near the midpoint at 52.5% means the terminal has carried both sides of trades, useful if you want one route for getting in and out.
Traders checking builder longevity
With fills dating back to 2026-04-30 and 138 on the books, there's enough history to judge how the terminal behaved across a stretch of market conditions.
Traders willing to ask about fees
The operator states no fee schedule anywhere public, so this suits someone prepared to confirm pricing directly rather than expect it published on a rate card.
Traders scouting inactive builders
The last seven and thirty days show $0 and $0 in routed flow, fitting someone specifically checking whether this builder has come back to life before committing new flow.

What it costs

Polyzard publishes no fee schedule. The operator states no rate anywhere public, so a trader arrives with nothing to compare before routing an order through it. Polymarket's own trading fee is fixed per market and applies the same way no matter which builder carries the order, so it isn't a point of difference between Polyzard and any other route into the same market.

What a trader should actually check is the order confirmation itself before committing size, since that's the only place a cost would show up when nothing is published elsewhere, and asking the operator directly for a written rate before moving real money is a reasonable ask given how thin the disclosure is.

Strengths

  • It carries a verified profile on Polymarket, which at least confirms the operator registered its builder code rather than routing anonymously.
  • Average fill size sitting at $5K shows it has handled serious-sized tickets, not just small test trades.
  • Buy share near the midpoint at 52.5% means it has carried both entries and exits rather than being a one-way onramp.
  • It has a trading history going back to 2026-04-30, long enough to have traded through more than one swing in the market.
  • Its all-time attributed volume of $13.8M is a large enough sample that the fill and buy-share figures aren't based on a handful of trades.

Limitations

  • It publishes no fee schedule anywhere, so a trader has to ask directly or test with a small order to find out the real cost before committing size.
  • Recent flow has gone quiet: the last seven and thirty days show $0 and $0 routed, with 0 fills and 0 traders a day, leaving little fresh activity to judge it by.
  • The operator states nothing about what the terminal offers beyond routing an order into Polymarket, so there's no way to weigh its tools against another terminal's.
  • The thirty-day trader cohort stands at 0, meaning there is currently no active user base behind the numbers to point to.

Custody and transparency

Polymarket settles trades and holds positions on-chain under the trader's own wallet, and nothing Polyzard publishes suggests it takes custody of funds itself; its role is limited to routing the order under its own code. Its verified profile on Polymarket confirms the operator registered that code, but transparency stops there: no fee schedule, and no detail on what happens to an order once it leaves the terminal.

The operational risk right now is timing, with recent volume, fills and active traders all sitting at $0, 0 and 0, so a trader routing size today would be testing a pipe that hasn't carried a fill in a while rather than relying on a proven, currently active route.

Verdict

Polyzard's numbers describe a terminal that, when active, handled large, two-way order flow from accounts sizing serious tickets rather than casual bets, backed by a trading history stretching back to 2026-04-30. What holds it back is transparency: no published fee schedule and, as of 2026-09-14, no fresh volume, fills or active traders to confirm it's still a live route into Polymarket.

It suits a trader who already has a relationship with the operator and wants to confirm pricing directly. It doesn't suit anyone who wants a fee schedule up front or needs to route an order today without first checking whether the pipe is actually open.

評分權重中有 100% 具備數據
2.1/5 分
  • 動能權重 35%

    attributed volume over the last seven complete days

  • 觸及權重 30%

    0 distinct traders per day

  • 歷史紀錄權重 20%

    routing since 2026-04-30

  • 透明度權重 15%

    verified profile, no published fee, public site

開啟 Polyzard,親自體驗

polyzard.com

開啟 Polyzard

Questions

  • What is Polyzard?

    Polyzard is a Polymarket trading terminal that routes order flow into the exchange under its own builder code, holding a verified profile and ranked #42 by all-time attributed volume of $13.8M.

  • Is Polyzard safe to use?

    Polymarket itself holds positions and funds on-chain under the trader's own wallet, and nothing Polyzard publishes suggests otherwise, but the operator discloses no fee schedule and recent flow has gone quiet, which limits how well it's currently being tested.

  • What fees does Polyzard charge?

    The operator publishes no fee schedule for Polyzard, and Polymarket's own trading fee is fixed per market regardless of which builder carries the order, so a trader has to confirm any additional cost directly before routing size.

  • Is Polyzard still active?

    As of 2026-09-14, the last seven and thirty days show $0 and $0 in routed volume with 0 fills and 0 traders a day, so recent activity has effectively gone quiet.

  • What is Polyzard's rank among Polymarket builders?

    Polymarket's public accounting places Polyzard at rank #42 by all-time attributed volume, having routed $13.8M since its first recorded fill on 2026-04-30, a track record spanning 138.

  • Does Polyzard hold my funds?

    No. Positions and balances settle on Polymarket's own contracts under the trader's own wallet, and nothing Polyzard publishes indicates it takes custody; its role is limited to routing the order under its own builder code.

  • What are the alternatives to Polyzard?

    Predicts.guru's leaderboard ranks every builder by attributed volume, fills and buy share the same way it ranks Polyzard, so comparing its $5K average fill and 52.5% buy share against other terminals is the fastest way to size up alternatives.

交易最多的市場

近 30 天的歸因交易量。

暫無近期市場構成數據。

類別分布

近 30 天此生態工具的流量去向。

暫無近期市場構成數據。

其他選擇

交易者會在其他 Trading Terminal 類生態工具之間取捨,指標相同。

此類別全部 115 個
生態工具全部時間
POPolyzard本工具
$13.8M
$2.2B
$538.9M
$293.8M
$213.1M

透過此生態工具交易的交易者

透過此生態工具交易的錢包,依已實現盈虧排名。

盈虧為各錢包在 Polymarket 的全域結果,並非此生態工具帶來的利潤。生態工具僅決定哪些錢包會被列出。

暫無此生態工具的交易者群體數據。

這些數字如何計算

Polymarket 公布 Polyzard 的全部時間交易量為 $13.8M,其中包含鏈上 V2 之前的歸因。用於計算費率、成交規模與買賣占比的已索引數字為 $839K,僅按 CLOB V2 上的結果份額面額計算,因此兩項總量本就不同。

歸因交易量中有 52.5% 為買方,可看出此渠道主要用於建倉還是平倉。

本頁的文字評述屬編輯內容,會定期重新生成;其中每一項數字都在頁面渲染時由上方的即時數據解析得出。