Predicts.guruPredicts.guru
PO

polymatics

Polymarket 排名第 172Analytics / Alerts首筆成交 2026-04-28數據截至 2026-09-14@polymatics_algo

開啟 polymatics

Polymatics is an institutional-grade execution and risk-management platform built for Polymarket and Kalshi, combining TWAP, VWAP, ICEBERG and GRID order algorithms with a portfolio risk dashboard and AI-driven analytics. It suits desks that want algorithmic order slicing over manual clicking, though access currently requires a private-beta request rather than an open signup.

評述撰寫於 2026-09-13。其中每項數字皆為即時數據。

近 7 天交易量
$7K

相較前七天 -39.7%。

每日交易者
0

近一週每日平均歸因獨立交易者數。

近 7 天成交筆數
56

全部時間平均成交 $110。

一覽

比較所需的每項數字,集中於一處。

排名
#172依全部時間歸因交易量
交易量(全部時間)
$513K
交易量(近 7 天)
$7K相較前一週 -39.7%
宣告費率
生態工具自行公布的費率
平均成交
$110
每日交易者
1近一週平均
錢包數(近 30 天)
1
買方占比
63%
首筆成交
2026-04-28140 天有活動
成交筆數(全部時間)
2.6K

交易量與排名來自 Polymarket 的生態工具排行榜;手續費、成交與買賣方來自已索引的 CLOB V2 活動,截至 2026-09-14。

每日活動

歸因交易量活躍交易者

What it is

Polymatics is a trading infrastructure platform for prediction markets, built around algorithmic execution rather than a simple order form. Its stated toolkit includes TWAP, VWAP, ICEBERG and GRID execution strategies, smart order routing between Polymarket and Kalshi, a portfolio risk dashboard tracking value at risk, concentration and correlation, and an AI layer for opportunity detection, execution optimization, predictive analytics, audit logs, regulatory reporting and performance attribution.

Access sits behind a private beta that a trader has to request rather than simply opening. On Polymarket its builder code has attracted $513K in attributed volume across 2.6K fills since 2026-04-28, with an average fill of $110 and 1 distinct wallets trading a day in the most recent stretch, numbers that describe a young, lightly used route into the order book rather than a venue tested across a full market cycle.

How it works

A trader requests access to the private beta before doing anything else; polymatics does not publish a public signup or self-serve onboarding flow, so getting in is a gate the operator controls, not a form a visitor fills out and starts trading from immediately.

Once inside, orders route through the platform's execution algorithms toward Polymarket's order book, with smart order routing also reaching Kalshi, so a single instruction can work across both venues instead of being placed manually on each. TWAP and VWAP algorithms spread an order over time, ICEBERG hides size, and GRID runs a rules-based strategy, all aimed at cutting the market impact a large order would otherwise cause.

Polymatics does not state whether it takes custody of trader funds or simply forwards instructions to Polymarket's own contracts; the product page describes portfolio risk analysis, audit logs and regulatory reporting as record-keeping features, but says nothing about where funds sit between an order being placed and a fill landing.

What it does

  • Algorithmic execution suite

    TWAP, VWAP, ICEBERG and GRID strategies slice large orders over time or hide their size, aimed at reducing the market impact a single big order would cause.

  • Cross-venue order routing

    Smart order routing works an instruction across Polymarket and Kalshi rather than requiring a trader to split and place it manually on each venue.

  • Portfolio risk dashboard

    Tracks value at risk, concentration and correlation at the position level, flagging exposure a trader watching price alone would miss.

  • Audit logs and reporting

    Keeps a record of execution and performance attribution, useful for a desk that has to document trades for compliance rather than just its own memory.

  • AI opportunity detection

    Machine-learning scans flag potential setups and execution tweaks, though the trader still decides whether to act on what it surfaces.

Who it is for

Desks running large orders
Algorithmic slicing across TWAP, VWAP and ICEBERG matters most when an order is big enough to move the market on its own.
Traders working Polymarket and Kalshi
Smart order routing lets one instruction reach both venues instead of managing two separate tickets by hand.
Risk-conscious portfolio managers
The VaR and concentration dashboard surfaces exposure across positions that a single market's order book never shows.
Compliance-minded funds
Audit logs and regulatory reporting give a paper trail that a casual trading app does not generate.
Casual one-off bettors
A private-beta request and institutional tooling built for slicing large orders is more machinery than a single small wager needs.

What it costs

Polymatics does not publish a fee schedule; the product page markets execution quality and risk tooling rather than a price list, so there is no advertised rate to quote here. Polymarket's own trading fee is set per market and applies the same way regardless of which builder routes the order, so it isn't something that separates polymatics from any other tool. Before routing size through it, a trader should ask the operator directly what the platform itself charges for access or execution, since the private-beta gate suggests pricing may be negotiated rather than posted, and nothing in the public material says otherwise.

Strengths

  • Offers algorithmic order types, TWAP, VWAP, ICEBERG and GRID, that a plain limit order screen cannot replicate.
  • Routes a single instruction across both Polymarket and Kalshi rather than forcing manual execution on each venue.
  • Includes a portfolio risk dashboard that tracks value at risk and concentration rather than leaving a trader to track exposure by hand.
  • Produces audit logs and performance attribution that a compliance-minded desk can hand to a reviewer.
  • Aims at the space between a plain market order and the execution tooling that larger accounts require.

Limitations

  • Access is gated behind a private beta and a request form, not something a trader can start using today.
  • Its own advertised fee is unpublished, leaving cost to a private conversation with the operator rather than a public rate card.
  • Attributed volume on Polymarket sits at $513K with 1 distinct wallets trading a day recently, a footprint that has not yet been tested at scale or across a market cycle.
  • Says nothing about whether it takes custody of trader funds between an order and a fill.
  • Built around institutional features like value-at-risk and regulatory reporting that add complexity a smaller trader may not need.

Custody and transparency

Polymatics does not state whether it holds trader funds or purely routes instructions to Polymarket's and Kalshi's own systems, and the product page is silent on custody arrangements entirely. Access is controlled through a private-beta request rather than an open signup, so the operator vets who gets in before a trader can commit anything. The audit logs and regulatory reporting the platform advertises are record-keeping features, not a substitute for knowing where funds sit while an order is open; a trader should confirm custody and settlement directly with the operator before routing size through an unpublished-fee, invite-only system.

Verdict

Polymatics reads as an attempt to bring desk-grade execution tooling, algorithmic order types, cross-venue routing and risk analytics, to a market that has mostly offered manual clicking. That ambition is real on the product page, but the private-beta gate, unpublished fee and #172 on the attributed-volume leaderboard mean the tool has not yet built a public track record on Polymarket itself. A trader who already manages size across Polymarket and Kalshi and wants algorithmic slicing has a reason to request access. A smaller trader placing occasional bets on single markets gains little from a risk dashboard built for larger books and should stick to simpler tools.

評分權重中有 100% 具備數據
2.2/5 分
  • 動能權重 35%

    attributed volume over the last seven complete days

  • 觸及權重 30%

    1 distinct traders per day

  • 歷史紀錄權重 20%

    routing since 2026-04-28

  • 透明度權重 15%

    verified profile, no published fee, public site

開啟 polymatics,親自體驗

polymatics.info

開啟 polymatics

Questions

  • What is polymatics?

    Polymatics is an institutional-grade execution and risk platform for Polymarket and Kalshi, offering algorithmic order types and portfolio risk analytics, currently open only through a private-beta access request.

  • Is polymatics safe to use?

    Polymatics does not state whether it custodies trader funds, and access is gated behind a private beta, so a trader should confirm custody and settlement directly with the operator before routing money through it.

  • What fees does polymatics charge?

    Polymatics publishes no fee schedule; a trader has to ask the operator directly what access or execution costs, since Polymarket's own per-market trading fee is separate and identical across every builder.

  • How does polymatics work?

    A trader requests access to the private beta, then places orders that route through algorithmic strategies like TWAP, VWAP, ICEBERG and GRID toward Polymarket's order book, with smart routing also reaching Kalshi.

  • What order types does polymatics support?

    The platform lists TWAP, VWAP, ICEBERG and GRID execution algorithms alongside custom strategies, built to spread or hide large orders rather than fill them in one clip.

  • What are alternatives to polymatics?

    Predicts.guru tracks many builders that route flow into Polymarket; comparing #172 and attributed volume against other tools on the leaderboard shows how much flow each carries.

  • Is polymatics live on Polymarket now?

    Yes, it has routed volume since 2026-04-28 and data through 2026-09-14 shows continued activity, though the operator still describes the wider product as a private beta.

交易最多的市場

近 30 天的歸因交易量。

  • 1Counter-Strike: CYBERSHOKE Prospects vs ex-Zero Tenacity (BO3) - NODWIN Clutch Series Group Stage$4K
  • 2Counter-Strike: Lavked vs Vexar (BO3) - Exort Fiesta Group Stage$3K
  • 3Counter-Strike: Lavked vs Vexar - Map 2 Winner$2K
  • 4Counter-Strike: Team Nemesis vs Sinners (BO3) - 1win Private Club #1: Closed Qualifier Playoffs$2K
  • 5Counter-Strike: paiN Academy vs Peladona - Map 2 Winner$2K
  • 6Counter-Strike: Butterfly vs Black Phoenix (BO3) - NODWIN Clutch Series Group Stage$2K
  • 7Counter-Strike: ex-RUBY vs Black Phoenix (BO3) - NODWIN Clutch Series Group Stage$2K
  • 8Counter-Strike: Lavked vs Vexar - Map 1 Winner$2K
  • 9Counter-Strike: Bushido Wildcats vs Honvéd - Map 2 Winner$1K
  • 10Counter-Strike: 1WIN vs INOX Division (BO3) - NODWIN Clutch Series Playoffs$1K

類別分布

近 30 天此生態工具的流量去向。

  • esports$54K

其他選擇

交易者會在其他 Analytics / Alerts 類生態工具之間取捨,指標相同。

此類別全部 39 個
生態工具全部時間
POpolymatics本工具
$513K
$272.1M
$79.1M
$44.1M
$14.6M

透過此生態工具交易的交易者

近 30 天有 1 個錢包透過此生態工具交易,依已實現盈虧排名。

盈虧為各錢包在 Polymarket 的全域結果,並非此生態工具帶來的利潤。生態工具僅決定哪些錢包會被列出。

#錢包30 天已實現盈虧路由交易量
10x757c…faad$538$54K

這些數字如何計算

Polymarket 公布 polymatics 的全部時間交易量為 $513K,其中包含鏈上 V2 之前的歸因。用於計算費率、成交規模與買賣占比的已索引數字為 $287K,僅按 CLOB V2 上的結果份額面額計算,因此兩項總量本就不同。

歸因交易量中有 63% 為買方,可看出此渠道主要用於建倉還是平倉。

本頁的文字評述屬編輯內容,會定期重新生成;其中每一項數字都在頁面渲染時由上方的即時數據解析得出。

polymatics 在 Polymarket 的交易量、手續費與交易者 | Predicts.guru