Predicts.guruPredicts.guru
LI

Liquid

Polymarket 排名第 510Trading Terminal數據截至 2026-09-14@getliquidapp

Liquid is a Polymarket trading terminal that currently shows almost no attributed order flow, sitting at rank #510 on the all-time volume leaderboard with total routed volume of $55. It suits traders scouting new terminals rather than anyone routing size today, since recent activity and cohort figures read as empty for the last complete week.

評述撰寫於 2026-09-13。其中每項數字皆為即時數據。

近 7 天交易量
$0

無可比較的前期數據。

每日交易者
0

近一週每日平均歸因獨立交易者數。

近 7 天成交筆數
0

尚無已索引的執行數據。

一覽

比較所需的每項數字,集中於一處。

排名
#510依全部時間歸因交易量
交易量(全部時間)
$55
交易量(近 7 天)
$0
宣告費率
生態工具自行公布的費率
平均成交
每日交易者
0近一週平均
錢包數(近 30 天)
0
買方占比
首筆成交
成交筆數(全部時間)
0

交易量與排名來自 Polymarket 的生態工具排行榜;手續費、成交與買賣方來自已索引的 CLOB V2 活動,截至 2026-09-14。

每日活動

歸因交易量活躍交易者

What it is

Liquid is a Polymarket trading terminal listed with a verified profile, placed at rank #510 among builders ranked by all-time attributed volume. Polymarket's central limit order book routes trades from every terminal, wallet and bot that carries a builder code, and Liquid is one of the smaller entries in that list, with total attributed volume of $55 recorded since tracking began.

The operator publishes no fee schedule for Liquid, so traders arrive without a stated rate to weigh against the cost of trading there. The trader cohort behind that volume numbers 0 wallets in the last thirty days, and the terminal has logged 0 fills in total, figures that describe a tool with a thin, largely dormant track record rather than an active venue.

How it works

A trader who routes flow through Liquid connects a Polymarket-compatible wallet and places orders that Polymarket's central limit order book matches against the rest of the market, the same book every other builder shares. Liquid's builder code tags the resulting fills so Polymarket's own accounting credits the volume to this profile rather than to Polymarket's default interface, which is how the $55 in lifetime attributed volume and the 0 fills get counted at all.

Settlement happens on Polygon through Polymarket's own smart contracts, and a builder code does not give the terminal custody of trader funds; the wallet that signs an order keeps the assets before and after the trade. What Liquid does not disclose is a fee schedule, so a trader cannot check the terminal's own math against what Polymarket settles. With 0 distinct traders routing through it on an average day over the last week, the cohort using it right now is worth checking before assuming it is actively maintained.

What it does

  • No custody of trader funds

    Assets stay in the trader's own wallet at every step, so Liquid is never in a position to freeze or move a balance.

  • On-chain settlement trail

    Every fill settles through Polymarket's contracts on Polygon, letting a trader verify a trade independently of anything Liquid reports.

  • No deposit step required

    A trader signs orders from their existing wallet rather than funding a separate balance inside Liquid before trading.

Who it is for

Terminal comparison shoppers
Useful for a trader building a shortlist of Polymarket builders to test, since it carries a verified profile and a small amount of recorded volume.
Traders chasing active liquidity
Not a fit right now: attributed volume over the last seven and thirty days reads as $0 and $0, with no distinct traders recorded per day.
Traders needing deep liquidity
Skip it for size: 0 fills over the last week and 0 traders per day give no sign of desk-level liquidity.
Risk-averse first-time builder users
A thin caution: with no stated fee schedule and no recent fills, there's little history to judge before routing size through Liquid.
Traders tracking builder momentum
Best approached with the #510 figure and $0 volume pulled up live, since the picture here can shift quickly from where it stands today.

What it costs

Liquid publishes no fee schedule, so a trader has no stated rate from the operator to weigh against Polymarket's own execution costs before routing an order. That gap matters more as size grows, since a desk moving real volume usually wants a number to model against before committing flow.

Attributed volume sits at $55 with no fills recorded in the last seven days, so there is too little recent activity to form a picture of what trading here currently costs. Anyone comparing Liquid against a builder with a published rate should treat the fee question as unresolved rather than favorable or unfavorable.

Strengths

  • Liquid holds a verified profile on Polymarket, which confirms its builder code is registered rather than spoofed.
  • Trades settle non-custodially through Polymarket's own contracts, so the terminal never holds trader funds between orders.
  • The lifetime attributed volume of $55 confirms the builder code has carried genuine, on-chain trade flow at some point rather than sitting entirely unused.
  • A trader can check the leaderboard rank of #510 directly rather than relying on marketing language to judge where Liquid stands.
  • No deposit step is required before trading, since orders route straight from the trader's own connected wallet.

Limitations

  • The operator publishes no fee schedule, leaving a trader to trade without a stated cost to plan around.
  • No fills and no attributed volume appear in the last seven or thirty days, so recent activity reads as inactive.
  • The thirty-day trader cohort is empty, meaning no fresh wallets have routed through Liquid lately.
  • The rank of #510 and lifetime volume of $55 reflect a limited track record, too thin to judge execution quality with confidence.

Custody and transparency

Trading through Liquid does not require depositing funds into the terminal itself; settlement runs through Polymarket's own contracts, so custody risk sits with the trader's wallet rather than with Liquid's infrastructure. The operator discloses no fee schedule, which is a transparency gap a trader should weigh before connecting a wallet, since there is no published number to hold the terminal accountable to. With no fills in the last seven days and an empty thirty-day trader cohort, operational risk leans toward the terminal being unmaintained rather than actively monitored, which matters if something goes wrong mid-session.

Verdict

Liquid reads as a builder that registered on Polymarket and processed a small amount of flow at some point, then went quiet. Lifetime volume of $55 and a rank of #510 confirm it exists and has moved real trades, but no fills in the last seven days and an empty thirty-day cohort mean there is no current activity to evaluate. Pair that with an unpublished fee schedule and the case for routing money through it today is weak. A trader doing due diligence on the full list of Polymarket builders can note it and move on; anyone looking for an active terminal with a stated cost should look elsewhere until fresh volume shows up.

評分權重中有 80% 具備數據
1.3/5 分
  • 動能權重 35%

    attributed volume over the last seven complete days

  • 觸及權重 30%

    0 distinct traders per day

  • 透明度權重 15%

    verified profile, no published fee, no public site

Questions

  • Is Liquid safe to use for trading on Polymarket?

    Liquid does not custody trader funds since settlement runs through Polymarket's own contracts, but it discloses no fee schedule and shows no recent fills, so treat it as unverified by current activity rather than proven safe or risky.

  • What is Liquid on Polymarket?

    Liquid is a Polymarket trading terminal with a verified profile and its own builder code, ranked #510 by all-time attributed volume of $55 on Polymarket's order book.

  • How much does Liquid charge in fees?

    The operator does not publish a fee schedule for Liquid, so there is no stated rate to quote; a trader has to weigh unknown cost against the terminal's thin, largely inactive recent history before routing an order.

  • Does Liquid hold custody of trader funds?

    No. Orders settle through Polymarket's own smart contracts on Polygon, and a builder code does not grant Liquid access to a trader's wallet or balance at any point in the process.

  • Is Liquid still active on Polymarket?

    Recent figures read as quiet: no fills or attributed volume appear in the last seven or thirty days, and the trader cohort for that window is empty, though lifetime volume of $55 shows it has traded before.

  • What are alternatives to Liquid for trading Polymarket markets?

    A trader comparing builders should check each one's leaderboard rank, recent attributed volume and whether it publishes a fee schedule, since those three factors separate an active, transparent terminal from one with a thin or stale track record.

交易最多的市場

近 30 天的歸因交易量。

暫無近期市場構成數據。

類別分布

近 30 天此生態工具的流量去向。

暫無近期市場構成數據。

其他選擇

交易者會在其他 Trading Terminal 類生態工具之間取捨,指標相同。

此類別全部 115 個
生態工具全部時間
LILiquid本工具
$55
$2.2B
$538.7M
$293.7M
$213M

透過此生態工具交易的交易者

透過此生態工具交易的錢包,依已實現盈虧排名。

盈虧為各錢包在 Polymarket 的全域結果,並非此生態工具帶來的利潤。生態工具僅決定哪些錢包會被列出。

暫無此生態工具的交易者群體數據。

這些數字如何計算

Polymarket 公布 Liquid 的全部時間交易量為 $55,其中包含鏈上 V2 之前的歸因。用於計算費率、成交規模與買賣占比的已索引數字為 $0,僅按 CLOB V2 上的結果份額面額計算,因此兩項總量本就不同。

本頁的文字評述屬編輯內容,會定期重新生成;其中每一項數字都在頁面渲染時由上方的即時數據解析得出。