croupion.com

croupion.com is a Polymarket builder listed under the trading terminal category with a verified profile on Polymarket's own registry. Its builder code currently shows #478 on the all-time attributed volume leaderboard, having routed $580 in total since its first recorded fill. The operator has not published details beyond what Polymarket's attribution system reports, so the profile speaks mostly through the flow it has carried.

Recent activity is thin: $0 routed over the last seven days and $0 over the last thirty, with 0 fills in that most recent week against 0 recorded since inception. 0 distinct traders used it per day on average last week, and the thirty-day cohort comes to 0 wallets. For a trader scanning builders before routing money, croupion.com currently reads as a quiet listing rather than an active terminal.

A trader connects a Polymarket account and routes orders with croupion.com's builder code attached, which is how Polymarket's attribution system credits volume to the profile. The operator has not detailed the connection flow beyond what Polymarket's own leaderboard confirms, so what is verifiable is the trail the code leaves rather than the interface itself.

Once an order carries the builder code, it settles through Polymarket's central limit order book like any other order, and the resulting fill is what Predicts.guru's index counts toward $580 and the more recent $0 and $0 windows. Funds and positions sit in the trader's own Polymarket wallet through that process; a builder code changes how a fill is credited, not who holds the assets.

Activity through this specific code has been sparse enough recently that 0 fills were recorded in the last week, against 0 since the profile started routing anything at all. That gap matters more than any interface detail: a trader checking whether the tool is currently in use should weigh the recent fill count as heavily as the total.

• No published fee rate

  The operator states no fee schedule, leaving traders to gauge cost from Polymarket's own CLOB mechanics rather than an advertised number.

• Thin fill history

  0 fills sit behind the all-time total, which is not enough of a record to show how the tool performs under sustained flow.

• Modest routed footprint

  $580 is the entire amount attributed to this builder code since it began, a small base for judging execution quality against.

Existing croupion.com users

Suits someone who already routes through croupion.com and wants to confirm their own fills still register against the current 0 weekly count.

Wallet or leaderboard researchers

Suits anyone cross-referencing Polymarket's builder leaderboard, since #478 and the cohort size here are concrete, checkable data points.

Traders wary of low-volume venues

Works as a caution case for traders who want to see what a stalled builder profile looks like before choosing a livelier one.

Data journalists tracking Polymarket tooling

Fits reporting on how many third-party Polymarket builders see real usage versus how many list a domain and little else.

croupion.com publishes no fee schedule of its own, so a trader has nothing declared to weigh against Polymarket's underlying CLOB costs. With 0 fills in the last week and $0 routed over the same period, there also is not enough recent flow for a measured rate to be meaningful right now; the 0 fills recorded since the profile started are the only base to draw from. Anyone still considering it should ask the operator directly for a current rate before sizing an order, rather than assuming a favorable one because none is stated.

• Its verified profile confirms that #478 and $580 come from Polymarket's own attribution system rather than the operator's own claim.
• The fill history behind 0 is short enough to review in full, without needing to sample a much larger ledger.
• Listing under the trading terminal category gives a search a defined starting point rather than an unlabeled entry.
• Order routing through a builder code never moves custody away from the trader's own Polymarket wallet, whichever profile is credited.

• Attributed volume has produced $0 over the last week and $0 over the last thirty days, meaning current activity is effectively absent.
• No traders were recorded per day last week and the thirty-day cohort stands at 0, so there is no active user base to judge the tool against right now.
• The operator states no fee rate anywhere, leaving cost entirely to inference from Polymarket's own mechanics.
• 0 fills across its entire recorded history is too few to show how the tool holds up under sustained order flow.

Custody is not the open question here, since Polymarket's CLOB architecture keeps funds in the trader's own wallet regardless of which builder code tags an order; the more relevant exposure is transparency. croupion.com carries a verified profile, which confirms the volume Polymarket attributes to it, but the operator states no fee schedule, so there is no declared number to hold it to. With both $0 and $0 showing no recent flow and a 0-wallet cohort over the last thirty days, there is also no active user base whose experience could surface a problem if one existed. That absence of live scrutiny is worth weighing before routing size through it.

croupion.com's case rests on activity that has largely stopped: $580 routed all time, #478 on the leaderboard, and no movement in the $0 and $0 windows through 2026-09-14. That alone is not disqualifying, since builder flow can restart, but it does mean there is currently no active cohort, no recent fill pattern and no stated fee to weigh. It fits someone auditing an existing account or tracking builder churn as a data point, not a trader looking to route fresh size through a terminal with a live track record right now. Anyone choosing where to send an order today should look for a builder showing recent activity instead.

• Is croupion.com safe to use on Polymarket?

  Funds stay in the trader's own wallet under Polymarket's CLOB architecture regardless of builder code, but croupion.com publishes no fee schedule and currently shows no active trader cohort, both worth weighing before routing size.

• What are croupion.com's fees?

  The operator states no fee rate. Traders relying on it have only Polymarket's own CLOB fee mechanics to reference, since no declared number exists to check against.

• How much volume does croupion.com route on Polymarket?

  It has attributed $580 all time and sits at #478 on the leaderboard, but both the $0 and $0 windows through 2026-09-14 show no recent flow.

• Is croupion.com still active?

  Recent figures show 0 fills in the last week and 0 traders per day on average, both effectively idle as of 2026-09-14 despite 0 fills recorded since inception.

• What is croupion.com on Polymarket?

  It is a Polymarket builder listed under the trading terminal category with a verified profile, meaning order flow tagged to its code is confirmed by Polymarket's own attribution system.

• What are alternatives to croupion.com?

  Any Polymarket builder with a currently active cohort and recent fill volume is a reasonable comparison point, since croupion.com's own recent activity has dropped to nothing.

• How does croupion.com route orders on Polymarket?

  Orders tagged with its builder code settle through Polymarket's central limit order book like any other order; the code only changes how the fill is credited, not who holds the funds.