Predicts.guruPredicts.guru
LI

Liquid

Polymarket 510위Trading Terminal2026-09-14까지의 데이터@getliquidapp

Liquid is a Polymarket trading terminal that currently shows almost no attributed order flow, sitting at rank #510 on the all-time volume leaderboard with total routed volume of $55. It suits traders scouting new terminals rather than anyone routing size today, since recent activity and cohort figures read as empty for the last complete week.

2026-09-13에 작성된 평가입니다. 안에 담긴 모든 수치는 실시간입니다.

최근 7일 거래량
$0

비교할 이전 기간 없음.

일평균 트레이더
0

최근 1주간 하루 평균 귀속 개별 트레이더 수.

최근 7일 체결
0

아직 색인된 체결 데이터가 없습니다.

한눈에 보기

비교에 필요한 모든 수치를 한 블록에.

순위
#510전체 기간 귀속 거래량 기준
카테고리
Trading Terminal
전체 기간 거래량
$55
최근 7일 거래량
$0
신고된 수수료
빌더가 스스로 공시한 요율
평균 체결
일평균 트레이더
0최근 1주 평균
최근 30일 지갑
0
매수 측
첫 체결
전체 기간 체결
0

거래량과 순위는 Polymarket 빌더 리더보드에서, 수수료·체결·매수 매도 비중은 2026-09-14까지 색인된 CLOB V2 활동에서 가져옵니다.

일별 활동

귀속 거래량활성 트레이더

What it is

Liquid is a Polymarket trading terminal listed with a verified profile, placed at rank #510 among builders ranked by all-time attributed volume. Polymarket's central limit order book routes trades from every terminal, wallet and bot that carries a builder code, and Liquid is one of the smaller entries in that list, with total attributed volume of $55 recorded since tracking began.

The operator publishes no fee schedule for Liquid, so traders arrive without a stated rate to weigh against the cost of trading there. The trader cohort behind that volume numbers 0 wallets in the last thirty days, and the terminal has logged 0 fills in total, figures that describe a tool with a thin, largely dormant track record rather than an active venue.

How it works

A trader who routes flow through Liquid connects a Polymarket-compatible wallet and places orders that Polymarket's central limit order book matches against the rest of the market, the same book every other builder shares. Liquid's builder code tags the resulting fills so Polymarket's own accounting credits the volume to this profile rather than to Polymarket's default interface, which is how the $55 in lifetime attributed volume and the 0 fills get counted at all.

Settlement happens on Polygon through Polymarket's own smart contracts, and a builder code does not give the terminal custody of trader funds; the wallet that signs an order keeps the assets before and after the trade. What Liquid does not disclose is a fee schedule, so a trader cannot check the terminal's own math against what Polymarket settles. With 0 distinct traders routing through it on an average day over the last week, the cohort using it right now is worth checking before assuming it is actively maintained.

What it does

  • No custody of trader funds

    Assets stay in the trader's own wallet at every step, so Liquid is never in a position to freeze or move a balance.

  • On-chain settlement trail

    Every fill settles through Polymarket's contracts on Polygon, letting a trader verify a trade independently of anything Liquid reports.

  • No deposit step required

    A trader signs orders from their existing wallet rather than funding a separate balance inside Liquid before trading.

Who it is for

Terminal comparison shoppers
Useful for a trader building a shortlist of Polymarket builders to test, since it carries a verified profile and a small amount of recorded volume.
Traders chasing active liquidity
Not a fit right now: attributed volume over the last seven and thirty days reads as $0 and $0, with no distinct traders recorded per day.
Traders needing deep liquidity
Skip it for size: 0 fills over the last week and 0 traders per day give no sign of desk-level liquidity.
Risk-averse first-time builder users
A thin caution: with no stated fee schedule and no recent fills, there's little history to judge before routing size through Liquid.
Traders tracking builder momentum
Best approached with the #510 figure and $0 volume pulled up live, since the picture here can shift quickly from where it stands today.

What it costs

Liquid publishes no fee schedule, so a trader has no stated rate from the operator to weigh against Polymarket's own execution costs before routing an order. That gap matters more as size grows, since a desk moving real volume usually wants a number to model against before committing flow.

Attributed volume sits at $55 with no fills recorded in the last seven days, so there is too little recent activity to form a picture of what trading here currently costs. Anyone comparing Liquid against a builder with a published rate should treat the fee question as unresolved rather than favorable or unfavorable.

Strengths

  • Liquid holds a verified profile on Polymarket, which confirms its builder code is registered rather than spoofed.
  • Trades settle non-custodially through Polymarket's own contracts, so the terminal never holds trader funds between orders.
  • The lifetime attributed volume of $55 confirms the builder code has carried genuine, on-chain trade flow at some point rather than sitting entirely unused.
  • A trader can check the leaderboard rank of #510 directly rather than relying on marketing language to judge where Liquid stands.
  • No deposit step is required before trading, since orders route straight from the trader's own connected wallet.

Limitations

  • The operator publishes no fee schedule, leaving a trader to trade without a stated cost to plan around.
  • No fills and no attributed volume appear in the last seven or thirty days, so recent activity reads as inactive.
  • The thirty-day trader cohort is empty, meaning no fresh wallets have routed through Liquid lately.
  • The rank of #510 and lifetime volume of $55 reflect a limited track record, too thin to judge execution quality with confidence.

Custody and transparency

Trading through Liquid does not require depositing funds into the terminal itself; settlement runs through Polymarket's own contracts, so custody risk sits with the trader's wallet rather than with Liquid's infrastructure. The operator discloses no fee schedule, which is a transparency gap a trader should weigh before connecting a wallet, since there is no published number to hold the terminal accountable to. With no fills in the last seven days and an empty thirty-day trader cohort, operational risk leans toward the terminal being unmaintained rather than actively monitored, which matters if something goes wrong mid-session.

Verdict

Liquid reads as a builder that registered on Polymarket and processed a small amount of flow at some point, then went quiet. Lifetime volume of $55 and a rank of #510 confirm it exists and has moved real trades, but no fills in the last seven days and an empty thirty-day cohort mean there is no current activity to evaluate. Pair that with an unpublished fee schedule and the case for routing money through it today is weak. A trader doing due diligence on the full list of Polymarket builders can note it and move on; anyone looking for an active terminal with a stated cost should look elsewhere until fresh volume shows up.

점수가중치의 80%에 데이터 있음
1.35점 만점
  • 성장세가중치 35%

    attributed volume over the last seven complete days

  • 도달가중치 30%

    0 distinct traders per day

  • 투명성가중치 15%

    verified profile, no published fee, no public site

Questions

  • Is Liquid safe to use for trading on Polymarket?

    Liquid does not custody trader funds since settlement runs through Polymarket's own contracts, but it discloses no fee schedule and shows no recent fills, so treat it as unverified by current activity rather than proven safe or risky.

  • What is Liquid on Polymarket?

    Liquid is a Polymarket trading terminal with a verified profile and its own builder code, ranked #510 by all-time attributed volume of $55 on Polymarket's order book.

  • How much does Liquid charge in fees?

    The operator does not publish a fee schedule for Liquid, so there is no stated rate to quote; a trader has to weigh unknown cost against the terminal's thin, largely inactive recent history before routing an order.

  • Does Liquid hold custody of trader funds?

    No. Orders settle through Polymarket's own smart contracts on Polygon, and a builder code does not grant Liquid access to a trader's wallet or balance at any point in the process.

  • Is Liquid still active on Polymarket?

    Recent figures read as quiet: no fills or attributed volume appear in the last seven or thirty days, and the trader cohort for that window is empty, though lifetime volume of $55 shows it has traded before.

  • What are alternatives to Liquid for trading Polymarket markets?

    A trader comparing builders should check each one's leaderboard rank, recent attributed volume and whether it publishes a fee schedule, since those three factors separate an active, transparent terminal from one with a thin or stale track record.

가장 많이 거래된 시장

최근 30일 귀속 거래량.

최근 시장 구성 데이터가 없습니다.

카테고리 구성

최근 30일간 이 빌더의 거래 흐름이 향한 곳.

최근 시장 구성 데이터가 없습니다.

대안

같은 지표로 비교한, 트레이더가 함께 고려할 다른 Trading Terminal 빌더들.

이 카테고리 전체 115개
빌더전체 기간
LILiquid현재 빌더
$55
$2.2B
$538.5M
$293.6M
$213M

이 빌더를 통해 거래한 트레이더

이 빌더를 통해 거래한 지갑, 실현 PnL 기준 순위.

PnL은 각 지갑의 Polymarket 전체 실적이며, 이 빌더에 귀속되는 수익이 아닙니다. 빌더는 어떤 지갑이 목록에 오르는지만 결정합니다.

이 빌더의 트레이더 집단 데이터가 없습니다.

이 수치의 측정 방식

Polymarket은 Liquid의 전체 기간 거래량을 $55로 보고하며, 여기에는 온체인 V2 이전의 귀속분이 포함됩니다. 수수료, 체결 규모, 매수·매도 비중 계산에 사용하는 색인 수치는 $0로, CLOB V2의 결과 지분 액면 명목 금액만 집계하므로 두 합계는 설계상 다릅니다.

이 페이지의 서술형 평가는 편집 콘텐츠이며 주기적으로 재생성됩니다. 그 안의 모든 수치는 페이지가 렌더링되는 시점에 위의 실시간 데이터에서 산출됩니다.